People v. Clark
Supreme Court of Colorado
1Per curiam
A hearing panel of the Supreme Court Grievance Committee approved a hearing board’s recommendation that the respondent be suspended from the practice of law for six months, with reinstatement contingent on the satisfaction of certain requirements, including that he undergo reinstatement proceedings pursuant to C.R.C.P. 241.22(b)-(d). The respondent defaulted before the grievance committee and has not appeared in this court. We generally accept the hearing panel’s recommendations, but modify the period of suspension to one year and one day. 1
I
The respondent was admitted to practice law in…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- People v. CrimaldiSupreme Court of Colorado · 1991
- People v. BarrSupreme Court of Colorado · 1993
- People v. JamesSupreme Court of Colorado · 1987
- People v. WilsonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1992
- People v. RossSupreme Court of Colorado · 1994
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- People v. RedmanSupreme Court of Colorado · 1995
- People v. ZimmermannSupreme Court of Colorado · 1998
- People v. RiversSupreme Court of Colorado · 1997
- In Re GreenSupreme Court of Colorado · 1999
- People v. SegalSupreme Court of Colorado · 2002
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.