Legal Opinion
Pistorino & Co. v. United States
United States Customs Court
Decided October 30, 1978No. C.D. 4774; Court Nos. 73-10-02911PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RAO, Judge:
These actions concern the proper tariff classification of “Plastak MT 10” and “Gesta SS 200” machines, and molds imported with these machines, exported from Italy and entered at the port of Boston in 1970, 1971, and 1972. The MT 10 is manufactured by Plastak Machinery, Italy, and the SS 200 is manufactured by Gesta S.p.A., also in Italy.
The machines were assessed with duty by the district director under item 878.35, TSUS, as modified by Presidential Proclamation 3822, T.D. 68-9, as machines used for molding or otherwise forming rubber or plastics, articles, and parts thereof, at a…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- United States v. Carborundum Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1976
- W. A. Gleeson v. The United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1970
- Maher-App & Co. v. The United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1969
- Converse Rubber Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1970
- Converse Rubber Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1972
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Torrington Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1990
- Audiovox Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1984
- Atari Caribe, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1992
- Transflock, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1991
- AutoAlliance International, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2002
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.