Catton, Neill & Co. v. United States
Court of Customs and Patent Appeals
Appeal from Board of United States General Appraisers, T. D. 38746 (G. A. 8442).
1Opinion of the CourtMartiN, Judge
The merchandise covered by this appeal consisted of certain centrifugal machines which were imported at the port of Honolulu for use in the manufacture of sugar upon Hawaiian plantations.
The collector assessed duty upon the main parts of the machines at the rate of 20 per cent ad valorem under the general provision for manufactures of metal in paragraph 167 of the tariff act of 1913. Certain ball and roller bearings, however, were assessed at the rate of 35 per cent ad valorem, under the eo nomine provision for such articles in paragraph 106 of the act.
The importers protested against the…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- United States v. BokerCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1915
- Klipstein v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1910
3Cited by17 opinions
- Davis Products, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1967
- Inter Maritime Fwdg. Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1967
- Marmax Trading Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1967
- Stern v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1970
- Theo. H. Davies & Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1973
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.