Legal Opinion

Pacific Guano & Fertilizer Co. v. United States

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided June 6, 1927No. 2866PublishedCited by 43 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSmith, Judge

Ground tankage imported from Argentina was classified by the collector at San Francisco as a nonenumerated manufactured article and accordingly assessed for duty at 20 per centum ad valorem under that part of paragraph 1459 which reads as follows:

1459. That there shall be levied, collected, and paid on * * * all articles manufactured, in whole or in part, not specially provided for, a duty of 20 per centum ad valorem.

The importers protested that the merchandise imported was not subject to duty and was entitled to free entry under that part of paragraph 1583 of said act which reads as follows:

G…

2Cited by43 opinions

  1. Ignaz Strauss & Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1942
  2. Kroder Reubel Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1960
  3. Novelty Import Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1968
  4. Hoffschlaeger Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1968
  5. Staalkat of America, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1967

38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API