Bird & Son, Inc. v. Limbach
Ohio Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtSweeney, J.
I
The instant appeal involves the levy of various sales and use tax assessments upon equipment employed in the manufacturing operation conducted by appellant. Appellant contends that the various items of equipment are exempt from sales and use taxation pursuant to R.C. 5739.01 *78(E)(2) and 5741.02(C)(2), respectively. R.C. 5739.01(E)(2) defines the types of sales at issue in the case sub judice. This section provides in relevant part:
“(E) ‘Retail sale’ and ‘sales at .retail’ include all sales except those in which the purpose of the consumer is: ■
<<* * *
“(2) To incorporate the thing transferred…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Hawthorn Mellody, Inc. v. LindleyOhio Supreme Court · 1981
- Canton Malleable Iron Co. v. PorterfieldOhio Supreme Court · 1972
- Southwestern Portland Cement Co. v. LindleyOhio Supreme Court · 1981
- Tri-State Asphalt Corp. v. GlanderOhio Supreme Court · 1950
- Ohio Ferro-Alloys Corp. v. KosydarOhio Supreme Court · 1973
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Ball Corp. v. LimbachOhio Supreme Court · 1992
- Am. Natl. Can Co. v. TracyOhio Supreme Court · 1995
- Fifth Column v. Village of Valley View, OhioDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 1998
- Jeep Corp. v. LimbachOhio Supreme Court · 1989
- Anheuser-Busch, Inc. v. TracyOhio Supreme Court · 1999
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.