General Motors Corp. v. Limbach
Ohio Supreme Court
1Per curiam
We will address each of the contested purchases seriatim.
I
Designs and Drawings
GM contracted with several outside design firms to design machinery. The design firms customarily sent the designs on tracings to GM. GM usually sent the tracings to other firms which produced the machinery that GM used in the production process. The machinery had to conform to the design on the tracing.
In a notice of additional authority and at oral argument, the commissioner conceded that these transactions were exempt professional service transactions under Emery Industries, Inc. v. Limbach (1989), 43 Ohio St. 3d…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Emery Industries, Inc. v. LimbachOhio Supreme Court · 1989
- White Motor Corp. v. KosydarOhio Supreme Court · 1977
- Ohio Ferro-Alloys Corp. v. KosydarOhio Supreme Court · 1973
- Timken Co. v. KosydarOhio Supreme Court · 1977
- Southwestern Portland Cement Co. v. LimbachOhio Supreme Court · 1988
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Sharp v. Tyler Pipe Industries, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)1996
- In re Allied Consol. Indus., Inc.United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Ohio · 2019
- John Sharp, Comptroller of Public Accounts, and Dan Morales, Attorney General of Texas v. Tyler Pipe Industries, Inc., Successor-In-Interest to Tyler Pipe Industries of Texas, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)1996