Legal Opinion

Wetherelt v. State

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided December 1, 1993No. 93-35PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MACY, Chief Justice.

Appellant Kerry Wetherelt appeals from her convictions for one count of felony larceny and for two counts of forgery.

We affirm.

Appellant states the issues on appeal as follows:

ISSUE I

Whether sufficient evidence was presented to sustain Appellant’s conviction of larceny under Wyoming Statute § 6-3-402[(a) and (c)(i)]

ISSUE II

Whether sufficient evidence was presented to sustain Appellant’s conviction of forgery under Wyoming Statute § 6-3-602[ (a)(ii) and (iii) ]

When reviewing the sufficiency of the evidence for a criminal conviction:

“ ‘[T]his court must determine whether,…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Broom v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Jennings v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1991
  3. Harvey v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1979
  4. Munson v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1989
  5. Murray v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1993

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Bloomquist v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1996
  2. Tanner v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2002
  3. Gregory M. Toth v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2015
  4. May v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2003
  5. Williams v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1999

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API