Legal Opinion

Munson v. State

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided March 17, 1989No. 88-65PublishedCited by 32 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

URBIGKIT, Justice.

A sufficiency of the evidence criminal appeal is presented by appellant’s three count burglary conviction after the other two alleged participants plea-bargained their guilty plea sentences.

We affirm.

Roy Munson, as appellant, presents two issues on appeal and we will only substantively consider the first for reasons hereafter stated. They are: (1) sufficiency of the evidence for convictions, and (2) “[wjhether that portion of § 7-13-301, W.S.1977, which requires that the prosecutor consent before a judge may grant first-offender status under § 7-13-301 is an unconstitutional…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. In Re WINSHIPSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  3. California v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  4. Knudson v. HilzerWyoming Supreme Court · 1976
  5. Wells v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1980

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by32 opinions

  1. Saldana v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Wehr v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1992
  3. Collins v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1993
  4. Jennings v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1991
  5. Tanner v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2002

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API