Thacher v. International Supply Co.
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
1Opinion of the CourtPi-Ielps, J.
The plaintiff in error, on? of the defendants in the trial court, was the owner of an oil and gas lease. He will hereinafter be called owner. He entered into a written contract with Iglehart & Smyer, which firm later became Iglehart & Sutton, to drill a well on the lease for oil or gas. Iglehart & Sutton were also defendants in the trial court, and they will hereinafter he called drillers. The drillers were to complete and equip the well at their own expense, free of cost to the owner, and thei contract also provided that they should “keep said well and lease free from all liens and claims of…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Christy v. Union Oil & Gas Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1911
- Brook v. BaylessSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1898
- Arkansas Fuel Oil Co. v. McDowellSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1926
- Brenner Oil Co. v. Dickason-Goodman Lbr. Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1925
- Interstate Bldg. & Loan Co. v. Oklahoma CitySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1921
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Consolidated Cut Stone Co. v. SeidenbachSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1937
- Adair v. Transcontinental Oil Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1959
- Schuman v. Board of Com'rs of Muskogee CountySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1939
- Sandlin v. PharoahSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1938
- Benson v. BensonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1944
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.