Legal Opinion

Schuman v. Board of Com'rs of Muskogee County

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided February 7, 1939No. 28055PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHurst, J.

' Mattie E. Friar brought an action to quiet title to certain property, including that involved herein. Schuman and Muskogee county, between whom this controversy arises, were made parties defendant. The county filed an answer and cross-petition alleging that it had never divested itself of the property and asked that its title thereto be quieted. Schuman filed a reply to the county’s answer and cross- petition stating that the county had divested itself of title to the 40 acres involved herein to him by deed, and further that the county is not entitled to equitable relief, since it did not…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Pan American Petroleum & Transport Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
  2. Causey v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
  3. Seller v. LingermanIndiana Supreme Court · 1865
  4. McAllister v. ClarkSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923
  5. Airy v. ThompsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1931

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Basil v. VincelloOhio Supreme Court · 1990
  2. Palmer v. Crews Lumber Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1973
  3. Board of County Com'rs v. City of Wewoka Ex Rel. NorthSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1942
  4. State Ex Rel. Com'rs of the Land Office v. PassmoreSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1941
  5. In Re First Penn CorporationCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1986

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API