Interstate Bldg. & Loan Co. v. Oklahoma City
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Error from District Court, Oklahoma County; Geo. W. Clark, Judge. Action by the Interstate Building & Loan Company and others against the City of Oklahoma City and others to enjoin assessments for certain paving. Judgment for defendants, and plaintiffs bring error.
1Opinion of the CourtJohnson, J.
The plaintiffs in error, as plaintiffs below, filed their petition in the district court of Oklahoma county, on the 3rd day of October, 1917, which stated, in sun-stance, that they were the owners of property liable for assessments on account of the improvement of what is known as Harndale addition, in Oklahoma City, lying between Classen boulevard on the west and Shartel avenue and Thirteenth street on the south and' Sixteenth street on the north; that the city of Oklahoma City, acting under the provisions of the paving law, directed the improvement of these streets, adopting the usual and…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Duniway v. PortlandOregon Supreme Court · 1905
- City of Forth Yakima v. ScudderWashington Supreme Court · 1905
- Tidal Oil Co. v. RoelfsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1920
- Parker v. TommSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1920
- Swan v. DuncanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1920
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Anderson-Kerr, Inc. v. Van MeterSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1933
- McLaughlin v. YinglingSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923
- Rogers v. BrummettSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923
- McAllister v. ClarkSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923
- Popp v. MungerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1928
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.