James Irby v. Republic Creosoting Company
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
RIVES, Circuit Judge.
The sole question to be decided is whether or not. appellant’s injury was caused by “an accident arising out of * * * his employment,” 1 so as to be compensable under the Alabama Workmen’s Compensation Law. The facts are clearly stated by the district court in its Findings of Fact. 129 F.Supp. 92, 93,
“James Irby, plaintiff, on November 12, 1953, while employed by and working at the defendant’s place of business in Mobile, Alabama, suffered an epileptic seizure which caused him to fall from a three-foot platform, 2 where he was engaged in his work for the defendant; and in…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Gonier v. Chase Companies, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1921
- Saint Paul-Mercury Indemnity Company v. Calvin T. Rutland, Doing Business as Rutland Contracting CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1955
- Alabama Textile Products Corporation v. GranthamSupreme Court of Alabama · 1955
- Barnett v. Britling Cafeteria Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1932
- Hyer v. Inter-Insurance Exchange of the Automobile ClubCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1926
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Allred v. Allred-Gardner, IncorporatedSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1960
- Ramirez & Feraud Chili Co. v. Las Palmas Food CompanyDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1956
- Slimfold Mfg. Co. v. MartinCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1981
- Southern Cotton Oil Company v. WynnSupreme Court of Alabama · 1957
- Howard v. Ford Motor CompanyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1962
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.