Howard v. Ford Motor Company
Missouri Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
MAUGHMER, Commissioner.
We have here a claim and suit for workmen’s compensation benefits. After an extended hearing the referee denied the claim. The Industrial Commission affirmed as did the circuit court and claimant has appealed. The referee found:(1) The employee, Emmett Howard, sustained an accident on June 18, 1959, “arising in the course of his employment with Ford Motor Company”, but “said accident did not arise out of said employment”.(2) “That the accident occurred when Emmett Howard suffered an insulin reaction which caused him to fall and thus his fall was the result of his own…
Also in this document: Per curiam.
2Cases cited18 opinions
- In Re Claim of Dependents of Seabaugh v. Garver Lumber Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1947
- Claim of Andrews v. L. & S. Amusement Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1930
- Kansas City v. RooneySupreme Court of Missouri · 1953
- Savage v. St. Aeden's ChurchSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1937
- Cinmino's CaseMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1925
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Alexander v. D.L. Sitton Motor LinesSupreme Court of Missouri · 1993
- Fingers v. Mount Tabor United Church of ChristMissouri Court of Appeals · 1969
- Koehler Electric v. WillsSupreme Court of Iowa · 2000
- Wheaton v. Reiser CompanyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1967
- McCue v. Studebaker Automotive Sales, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1965
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.