Legal Opinion

Union Lithograph Co. v. Bacon

California Supreme Court

Decided September 30, 1918No. S. F. No. 7714PublishedCited by 11 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtMelvin, J.

These appeals are from a judgment of September 13, 1915, and from certain orders which will be more fully described in the course of this opinion.

The action was commenced in 1914 by the “Union Lithograph Company on Behalf of all Creditors of the Salinas Portland Cement Company v. W. R. Bacon” and other named defendants. The stated purpose of the action was “to create a fund by collecting stock subscriptions, to pay debts of Salinas Portland Cement Company.” The complaint set forth the insolvency and forfeiture of its charter by the cement company; the indebtedness of that corporation…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. County of San Bernardino v. County of RiversideCalifornia Supreme Court · 1902
  2. In re Estate of BabyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
  3. Storke v. StorkeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
  4. Hayes v. . NourseNew York Court of Appeals · 1887
  5. Shaver v. TunsteadCalifornia Supreme Court · 1900

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Reitano v. YankwichCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951
  2. Schubert v. ReichCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950
  3. Klebora v. KleboraCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1931
  4. Hartke v. AbbottCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930
  5. Lafleur v. M. A. Burns Lumber Co.California Supreme Court · 1922

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API