Legal Opinion

Diaz v. Jones and Laughlin Steel Corp.

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided May 26, 1952No. Appeal, 31PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Dithrich, J.,

In this workmen’s compensation case, which has been shifted from pillar to post for eleven years and is now before this Conrt for the second time, the learned court below reversed the decision of the board and awarded claimant compensation. Claimant, a painter, alleged that on May 14, 1941, he suffered an accidental injury in the course of his employment which required the removal of his left eye; Referee Curtis, to whom the claim was first referred, awarded compensation for seven weeks’ disability but, having found as a fact that the claimant did not have industrial…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Vorbnoff v. Mesta Machine Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1926
  2. Monahan v. Seeds & DurhamSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1939
  3. Ford v. A. E. Dick Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1926
  4. Paulin v. Williams Co., Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1936
  5. Diaz v. Jones & Laughlin Steel Corp.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1944

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Hershey Estates v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
  2. Giallonardo v. St. Joseph's CollegeSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1955
  3. Messikomer v. Baldwin Locomotive WorksSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1955
  4. Glabern Corp. v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
  5. Oliver v. Westinghouse Electric Corp.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1958

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API