Legal Opinion

Diaz v. Jones & Laughlin Steel Corp.

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 28, 1944No. Appeal, 59PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Keller, P. J.,.. The claimant, a painter in the employ of the defendant company for fifteen years, on May 14, 1941, received an injury to his left eye, through some paint which was sprayed into it by a fellow workman, which disábled him from working for seven weeks and required the removal of the eye.

At the hearing upon his claim petition, he proved, to the satisfaction of the compensation áuthorities, his employment, the injury to his eye, his inability to work as a result of the injury for seven weeks, and his permanent loss of the eye by its surgical removal. He thus made out a…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Elonis v. Lytle Coal Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1938
  2. Quinn v. American International Ship Building Corp.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1921

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Curran v. Walter E. Knipe & Sons, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1958
  2. Hershey Estates v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
  3. Messikomer v. Baldwin Locomotive WorksSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1955
  4. Diaz v. Jones and Laughlin Steel Corp.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1952
  5. Wilson v. State Industrial Accident CommissionOregon Supreme Court · 1950

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API