Legal Opinion

Messikomer v. Baldwin Locomotive Works

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided July 21, 1955No. Appeal, 180PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Wrigi-it, J.,

This is a workmen’s compensation case. The Court of Common Pleas overruled defendants’ exceptions to an award made by the Workmen’s Compensation Board and entered final judgment in favor of the claimant. Defendants have appealed.

Emil H. Messikomer, husband of claimant appellee, had been employed by Baldwin Locomotive Works for 32 years prior to November 14, 1947. During this entire period he enjoyed excellent health and never lost any time due to illness. He was an industrious worker, almost six feet in height, and weighed 180 pounds. On November 14, 1947, while on a…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Wilkinson v. United Parcel Service of Pennsylvania, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1945
  2. Kline v. KiehlSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1945
  3. Palermo v. North East Preserving Works, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1940
  4. DeBattiste v. Anthony Laudadio & SonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1950
  5. Diaz v. Jones & Laughlin Steel Corp.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1944

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Nelson v. Borough of GreenvilleSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1956
  2. Susman v. Kaufmann's Department StoreSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1956
  3. Landis v. General Motors Corp.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1956
  4. McGowan v. Upper Darby Pet SupplySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1966
  5. Barber v. Fleming-Raugh, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1966

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API