Legal Opinion

Dial Toaster Corp. v. Waters-Genter Co.

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided August 29, 1930No. 27,611PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

1 Reported in 233 N.W. 870. After adverse findings and order for judgment its motion for a new trial was denied, and plaintiff appeals.

The action arises from a "patent pooling" contract of March 19, 1927. The patents involved covered automatic electric bread toasters and improvements thereto. One, known as the Rogers patent, was owned by plaintiff. Others, the "Strite patents," were owned by defendant Waters-Genter Company, hereinafter referred to as though it were the sole defendant. Its codefendant, Walter E. Johnson, can be more conveniently designated by his surname only. He was the third…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Dalzell v. Dueber Watch Case Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1893
  2. Mayer v. . McCreeryNew York Court of Appeals · 1890
  3. Shepard v. CarpenterSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1893
  4. Williams v. StewartSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1879
  5. Ball & Socket Fastener Co. v. Ball Glove Fastening Co.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1893

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Romain v. Pebble Creek PartnersSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1981
  2. Zelle v. Chicago & North Western Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1954
  3. Kennedy v. HasseSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1962
  4. City of Waseca v. BraunSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1939
  5. City of Waseca v. BraunSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1939

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API