Zelle v. Chicago & North Western Railway Co.
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
Nelson, Justice.
The present action is for a declaratory judgment that the alternative remedy provided for by the parties in a pooling agreement voluntarily entered into is a valid remedy. It is not an action for specific performance. We may for all necessary purposes herein refer to plaintiffs-respondents as the Wisconsin Central and to defendant-appellant as the North Western. The Wisconsin Central and the North Western have separate lines serving the mines on the Gogebic Iron Range of upper Wisconsin and Michigan, extending from the mines to their separate ore docks at Ashland, Wisconsin,…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Park Construction Co. v. Independent School District No. 32Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1941
- Dore v. Southern Pac. Co.California Supreme Court · 1912
- Shepard v. CarpenterSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1893
- Goddard v. KingSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1889
- Park Construction Co. v. Independent School District No. 32Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1943
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Layne-Minnesota Co. v. Regents of the University of MinnesotaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1963
- Bennett v. MeaderSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
- Dunshee v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1975
- Niazi v. St. Paul Mercury Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1963
- David Co. v. Jim W. Miller Construction, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1989
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.