Legal Opinion

City of Waseca v. Braun

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided October 27, 1939No. 32,091PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

•Julius J. Olson, Justice.

Defendant was convicted of violating “An ordinance to license and regulate hawkers, peddlers and canvassers, and the selling of goods from door to door in the City of Waseca, Minnesota.” He appeals from an order denying his blended motion for amended findings and conclusions of law, or, if that be denied, for a'new trial.

Section 1 of the ordinance provides:

“That no person, as hawker, peddler or canvasser for the sale of any property, except where such property is sold at wholesale to dealers in such articles, shall sell or offer to sell, canvass for, or sell for…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Robbins v. Shelby County Taxing DistrictSupreme Court of the United States · 1887
  2. Binderup v. Pathe Exchange, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1923
  3. Gwin, White & Prince, Inc. v. HennefordSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
  4. Brennan v. TitusvilleSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
  5. Minnesota v. BlasiusSupreme Court of the United States · 1933

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. City of Waseca v. BraunSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1939

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API