Legal Opinion

City of Waseca v. Braun

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided October 27, 1939No. 32,091PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

1 Reported 288 N.W. 229. Defendant was convicted of violating "An ordinance to license and regulate hawkers, peddlers and canvassers, and the selling of goods from door to door in the City of Waseca, Minnesota." He appeals from an order denying his blended motion for amended findings and conclusions of law, or, if that be denied, for a new trial.

Section 1 of the ordinance provides:

"That no person, as hawker, peddler or canvasser for the sale of any property, except where such property is sold at wholesale to dealers in such articles, shall sell or offer to sell, canvass for, or sell for…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. Robbins v. Shelby County Taxing DistrictSupreme Court of the United States · 1887
  2. Binderup v. Pathe Exchange, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1923
  3. Gwin, White & Prince, Inc. v. HennefordSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
  4. Brennan v. TitusvilleSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
  5. Minnesota v. BlasiusSupreme Court of the United States · 1933

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Dayton Co. v. Carpet, Linoleum & Resilient Floor Decorators' UnionSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1949
  2. Glover v. Minneapolis Building Trades CouncilSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1943
  3. State v. BristSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2012
  4. Louis N. Kitten & Co. v. Commissioner of RevenueSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1982

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API