Legal Opinion

In re the Claim of Class

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided May 13, 1999PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

—Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed August 7, 1998, which ruled that claimant was disqualified from receiving unemployment insurance benefits because his employment was terminated due to misconduct.

Claimant was discharged from his employment after the employer discovered that claimant had failed to disclose on his employment application that he had been convicted of a felony. The employment application specifically stated that, if hired, any falsification or omission of information could lead to dismissal. Notwithstanding claimant’s reasons for doing so,…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. In re the Claim of JarvisAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Roman v. Cornell UniversityDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 1999
  2. In re the Claim of ReddenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
  3. In re the Claim of DesirAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
  4. In re the Claim of SmithAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
  5. In re the Claim of AllenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API