Legal Opinion

In re the Claim of Mears

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided September 11, 2003PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

—Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed October 25, 2002, which ruled, inter alia, that claimant was disqualified from receiving unemployment insurance benefits because his employment was terminated due to misconduct.

Substantial evidence supports the decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board that claimant was discharged from his employment as a warehouse worker due to disqualifying misconduct. The record establishes that claimant and a coworker argued after the coworker criticized claimant for the way he was loading a freight elevator. Claimant…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. In re the Claim of SantanaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
  2. In re the Claim of DesirAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
  3. In re the Claim of CastroAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. In re the Claim of EisenstadtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
  2. In re the Claim of PerkinsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
  3. In re the Claim of MossAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API