Legal Opinion
Lee v. Auto-Owners Insurance
Michigan Court of Appeals
Decided October 25, 1996No. Docket 175571PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*674Michael J. Kelly, P.J.
This case is before us a third time, on second remand. We initially reversed the trial court’s denial of defendant Auto-Owners’ motion for summary disposition and affirmed the trial court’s dismissal of Auto-Owners’ claim of release. Lee v Auto-Owners Ins Co, 201 Mich App 39; 505 NW2d 866 (1993), vacated 445 Mich 906 (1994).
On the first remand, we determined that MCL 500.2254; MSA 24.12254 does not affect the insurance contract between plaintiff Lee and Auto-Owners and that plaintiff was not entitled to arbitration under the policy. Lee v Auto-Owners Ins Co (On Remand),…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Allstate Insurance v. KeillorMichigan Supreme Court · 1995
- Poynter v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1968
- Lee v. Auto-Owners InsuranceMichigan Court of Appeals · 1993
- Stolaruk Corp. v. Central Natioanl InsuranceMichigan Court of Appeals · 1994
- Flanary v. Reserve Insurance Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1961
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Ferrando v. Auto-Owners Mutual InsuranceOhio Supreme Court · 2002
- Tenneco Inc. v. Amerisure Mutual InsuranceMichigan Court of Appeals · 2008
- Taylor v. Government Employees Insurance Co.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1999
- Hasper v. Center Mutual Insurance Co.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2006
- Woznicki v. GEICO Morse v. Erie InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2015
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.