Legal Opinion

Taylor v. Government Employees Insurance Co.

Hawaii Supreme Court

Decided May 5, 1999No. 21227PublishedCited by 41 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the Court by

LEVINSON, J.

The plaintiffs-appellants Rosalina V. Taylor (Rosalina) and Emilio I. Taylor (collectively, the Taylors) appeal from the first circuit court’s judgment and order denying their motion for summary judgment and granting the cross-motion of the defendant-appellee Government Employees Insurance Company (GEICO) for summary judgment. On appeal, the Taylors contend that (1) the consent:to-settle clause in their underinsured motorist (UIM) policy is void as against public policy and (2) GEICO’s refusal to consent to a settlement in an amount only $2000.00 less than…

2Cases cited84 opinions

  1. Amfac, Inc. v. Waikiki Beachcomber Investment Co.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1992
  2. State v. ArceoHawaii Supreme Court · 1996
  3. State v. ToyomuraHawaii Supreme Court · 1995
  4. Gray v. Administrative Director of CourtHawaii Supreme Court · 1997
  5. Schmidt v. ClothierSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1983

79 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by41 opinions

  1. Dairy Road Partners v. Island Insurance Co.Hawaii Supreme Court · 2000
  2. Coon v. City and County of HonoluluHawaii Supreme Court · 2002
  3. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co. v. Pacific Rent-All, Inc.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1999
  4. Fujimoto v. AuHawaii Supreme Court · 2001
  5. Hasper v. Center Mutual Insurance Co.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2006

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API