Legal Opinion

Allstate Insurance v. Keillor

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided August 22, 1995No. 98957, (Calendar No. 11)PublishedCited by 32 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

AFTER REMAND

Cavanagh, J.

We affirm the decision of the Court of Appeals in part. The homeowner’s insur*415anee policy issued by plaintiff does not provide liability coverage for personal injuries arising out of the ownership, maintenance, use, loading, or unloading of any motorized vehicle. Therefore, the personal injuries forming the basis of this case, arising out of an automobile accident, are excluded from the scope of the plaintiff’s policy.

i1

On March 8, 1986, one week before Daniel Hayes’ entry into the United States Air Force, he gave himself a going away party at a friend’s home. He bought…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Auto-Owners Insurance v. ChurchmanMichigan Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Allstate Insurance v. FreemanMichigan Supreme Court · 1989
  3. Allstate Insurance v. HayesMichigan Supreme Court · 1993
  4. Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance v. StarkMichigan Supreme Court · 1991
  5. Vanguard Insurance v. ClarkeMichigan Supreme Court · 1991

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by32 opinions

  1. Max True Plastering Co. v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1996
  2. Tenneco Inc. v. Amerisure Mutual InsuranceMichigan Court of Appeals · 2008
  3. South MacOmb Disposal Authority v. American InsuranceMichigan Court of Appeals · 1998
  4. McKusick v. Travelers Indemnity Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 2001
  5. Pacific Employers Insurance v. Michigan Mutual InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1996

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API