Legal Opinion

Lee v. Auto-Owners Insurance

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided August 2, 1993No. Docket 134748PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtConnor, J.

Defendant insurance company appeals as of right 1 the trial court’s summary dismissal of several of its affirmative defenses. We affirm in part, reverse in part, and remand.

Plaintiff was a passenger in an automobile involved in an accident and suffered serious injuries. The driver had only the statutory minimum liability insurance coverage of $20,000 at the time of the accident. Plaintiff had underinsured motorist coverage with defendant insurance company for up to $50,000. Plaintiff sued the driver and subsequently settled for $20,000. As part of the settlement, plaintiff signed a form that…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. MacDonald v. PerryMichigan Supreme Court · 1955
  2. Bradt v. Allstate Insurance Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1970

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Romska v. OpperMichigan Court of Appeals · 1999
  2. Lee v. Auto-Owners InsuranceMichigan Court of Appeals · 1996
  3. Ranes v. American Family Mutual InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1997
  4. Berkel & Co. Contractors v. Christman Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1995
  5. Linebaugh v. Farm Bureau Mutual InsuranceMichigan Court of Appeals · 1997

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API