Lopes v. City of Peabody
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
1Opinion of the CourtWilkins, J.
We consider this case on remand from the Supreme Court of the United States in light of that Court’s opinion in Lucas v. South Carolina Coastal Council, 112 S. Ct. 2886 (1992). 2 In its Lucas opinion, the Supreme Court held that a landowner was entitled to compensation for a taking when a zoning regulation effectively prohibited all economically beneficial use of the land, unless the prohibition could be independently justified under principles of South Carolina nuisance or property law. Id. at 2900.
The plaintiff Lopes commenced this action in the Land Court in December, 1989, pursuant to G.…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Penn Central Transportation Co. v. New York CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Lucas v. South Carolina Coastal CouncilSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- First English Evangelical Lutheran Church v. County of Los AngelesSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Agins v. City of TiburonSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Phillips v. Youth Development Program, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1983
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by29 opinions
- Greenfield Country Estates Tenants Ass'n v. DeepMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1996
- FIC Homes of Blackstone, Inc. v. Conservation CommissionMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1996
- Davis v. Zoning Board of ChathamMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2001
- Leonard v. Town of BrimfieldMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1996
- Goulding v. CookMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1996
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.