FIC Homes of Blackstone, Inc. v. Conservation Commission
Massachusetts Appeals Court
1Opinion of the CourtLenk, J.
Acting under Blackstone’s wetlands by-law (1991), that town’s conservation commission denied to the plaintiffs an order of conditions for construction of a house and driveway on a lot that bordered on and included a vegetated wetland. The proposed construction would violate a by-law prohibition against building within 100 feet of a wetland, and would, the commission concluded, have an adverse impact on interests protected by the by-law, including ground water supply, storm damage prevention, prevention of pollution, and protection of wildlife habitat. The plaintiffs appealed from the denial…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Penn Central Transportation Co. v. New York CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Williamson County Regional Planning Commission v. Hamilton Bank of Johnson CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Lucas v. South Carolina Coastal CouncilSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Loretto v. Teleprompter Manhattan CATV Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Ruckelshaus v. Monsanto Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by57 opinions
- SBT HOLDINGS, LLC v. Town of WestminsterCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2008
- Conservation Commission v. PachecoMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2000
- Oyster Creek Preservation, Inc. v. Conservation CommissionMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2007
- Dubuque v. Conservation CommissionMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2003
- Commonwealth v. BlairMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2004
52 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.