Habitat Trust for Wildlife, Inc. v. City of Rancho Cucamonga
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
MILLER, J.
Plaintiff, The Habitat Trust for Wildlife, Inc. (Habitat), appeals from a judgment in favor of defendants City of Rancho Cucamonga and city council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga (sometimes City Council otherwise, collectively City) on its petition for writ of mandate. By its petition Habitat sought to force City to set aside a resolution determining that Habitat is not a qualified conservation entity (QCE) and to enter a new resolution based upon substantial evidence and in compliance with California law. Habitat argues that the petition was wrongfully denied by the trial…
2Cases cited56 opinions
- Aguilar v. Atlantic Richfield Co.California Supreme Court · 2001
- Guz v. Bechtel National, Inc.California Supreme Court · 2000
- Bixby v. PiernoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
- Carma Developers (California), Inc. v. Marathon Development California, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1992
- Cortez v. Purolator Air Filtration Products Co.California Supreme Court · 2000
51 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by39 opinions
- American Master Lease LLC v. Idanta Partners, Ltd.California Court of Appeal · 2014
- San Mateo Union High School District v. County of San MateoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2013
- Center for Biological Diversity v. County of San BernardinoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2010
- Green Valley Landowners Ass'n v. City of VallejoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2015
- Young v. City of CoronadoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2017
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.