Legal Opinion

Food Safety Net Services v. Eco Safe Systems USA, Inc.

California Court of Appeal

Decided October 4, 2012No. B231667PublishedCited by 48 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

MANELLA, J.

After respondent Food Safety Net Services (Food Safety) sought to recover its fee from appellant Eco Safe Systems USA, Inc. (Eco Safe), for performing a study of Eco Safe’s food disinfection equipment, Eco Safe asserted a cross-complaint against Food Safety for breach of contract, negligence, fraud, and related claims. The trial court granted summary judgment in favor of Food Safety on Eco Safe’s claims, concluding that they failed in light of (1) a limitation of liability clause in the parties’ contract, (2) Eco Safe’s failure to establish fraud or deceit, and (3) the…

2Cases cited44 opinions

  1. Aguilar v. Atlantic Richfield Co.California Supreme Court · 2001
  2. Parsons v. Bristol Development Co.California Supreme Court · 1965
  3. Santisas v. GoodinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1998
  4. Robinson Helicopter Co., Inc. v. Dana Corp.California Supreme Court · 2004
  5. Leal v. Holy Spirit Ass'n for Unification of World ChristianityCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988

39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by48 opinions

  1. Marentes v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.District Court, N.D. California · 2016
  2. Vita Planning & Landscape Architecture, Inc. v. HKS Architects, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2015
  3. Michael Terpin v. at and T Mobility LLCCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2024
  4. Lewis v. Youtube, LLCCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2016
  5. Rodman v. Safeway Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2015

43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API