Legal Opinion
Lubrizol Corp. v. Exxon Corp.
District Court, N.D. Ohio
Decided June 17, 1988No. C84-1064PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OF DECISION
BATCHELDER, District Judge.
On March 30, 1984, plaintiff the Lubrizol Corporation (“Lubrizol”) commenced this action against defendant Exxon Corporation (“Exxon”) alleging that certain products manufactured by Exxon infringe a number of Lubrizol patents, including U.S. Patent 4,234,435 (the “435 Patent”). On April 25, 1988, Lubrizol filed a motion seeking a preliminary injunction to enjoin Exxon from selling any lubricating composition or additive which contains an Exxon product known as ECA 10444 which Lubrizol claims to infringe the ’435 Patent.
I. FINDINGS OF FACT
BACKGRO…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Graham v. John Deere Co. of Kansas CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- American Hoist & Derrick Company, Cross-Appellee v. Sowa & Sons, Inc., Cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1984
- Autogiro Company of America v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1967
- W.L. Gore & Associates, Inc., Appellant/cross-Appellee v. Garlock, Inc., Appellee/cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1983
- Loctite Corporation, Appellant/cross-Appellee v. Ultraseal Ltd., Appellees/cross-AppellantsCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1985
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Monsanto Co. v. ScruggsDistrict Court, N.D. Mississippi · 2001
- WR Grace & Co.-Conn. v. Intercat, Inc.District Court, D. Delaware · 1999
- Bausch & Lomb Inc. v. Alcon Laboratories, Inc.District Court, W.D. New York · 1999
- Trustees of Columbia University v. Roche Diagnostics GmbHDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2001
- Eolas Technologies, Inc. v. Microsoft Corp.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2003
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.