Monsanto Co. v. Scruggs
District Court, N.D. Mississippi
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
PEPPER, District Judge.
This cause is before the Court on the plaintiffs Motion for a Preliminary Injunction. The Court, having reviewed the motion, the response, the briefs of the parties, the authorities cited, and being otherwise fully advised in the premises, finds as follows, to-wit:
FACTS
This case involves a dispute between the parties over the defendants’ unlicensed use of plaintiffs patented technology as incorporated into various agricultural products, specifically Roundup Ready® soybean and cotton seed, and Bollgard® cotton seed. Plaintiff asserts that the…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Sears, Roebuck & Co. v. Stiffel Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Morton Salt Co. v. G. S. Suppiger Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Hybritech Incorporated v. Monoclonal Antibodies, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1986
- United Shoe MacHinery Corp. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
- Hybritech Incorporated v. Abbott LaboratoriesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1988
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Farmland Mut. Ins. Co. v. ScruggsMississippi Supreme Court · 2004
- Monsanto Co. v. ScruggsDistrict Court, N.D. Mississippi · 2004
- Arizona Cartridge Remanufacturers Ass'n v. Lexmark International, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2003
- Monsanto Co. v. ParrDistrict Court, N.D. Indiana · 2008
- Mitchell Scruggs v. Greg BostMississippi Supreme Court · 2014
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.