Legal Opinion
WR Grace & Co.-Conn. v. Intercat, Inc.
District Court, D. Delaware
Decided August 9, 1999No. Civ.A. 93-522-LONPublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
LONGOBARDI, Senior District Judge.
I. Introduction
This is the damages phase of a patent infringement action. The Court conducted a bench trial over eight days beginning September 10, 1996 to determine liability. On September 8, 1997, the Court found that plaintiffs patents were valid and enforceable, were willfully infringed by defendant Intercat, both contributorily and by inducement, and were directly infringed by defendant Conoco. 1 The Court entered a permanent injunction against further infringement by defendants on November 3, 1997. The Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit…
2Cases cited38 opinions
- General Motors Corp. v. Devex Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Rite-Hite Corp. v. Kelley Co.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1995
- Aro Manufacturing Co. v. Convertible Top Replacement Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Avia Group International, Inc., (Formerly Pensa, Inc.) v. L.A. Gear California, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1988
- Panduit Corp. v. Stahlin Bros. Fibre Works, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1978
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Bracco Diagnostics, Inc. v. Amersham Health, Inc.District Court, D. New Jersey · 2009
- In Re Intercat, Inc.United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Georgia · 2000
- WesternGeco L.L.C. v. Ion Geophysical Corp.District Court, S.D. Texas · 2013
- Trustees of Columbia University v. Roche Diagnostics GmbHDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2001
- Bracco Diagnostics, Inc. v. Amersham Health, Inc.District Court, D. New Jersey · 2009
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.