Legal Opinion
Bausch & Lomb Inc. v. Alcon Laboratories, Inc.
District Court, W.D. New York
Decided September 16, 1999No. 6:94-cv-06534PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DECISION AND ORDER
LARIMER, Chief Judge.
INTRODUCTION
Plaintiff, Bausch & Lomb Incorporated (“B & L”), commenced this action under 35 U.S.C. § 281, alleging that defendant, Aeon Laboratories, Inc. (“Aeon”), has infringed on United States Patent No. 5,096,607 (“the ’607 patent”). The ’607 patent claims an invention in a process for simultaneously cleaning and disinfecting contact lenses using a single solution, as opposed to using two separate steps, first to clean the lenses and then to disinfect them.
Several motions are pending before the court. Alcon has filed a motion for summary judgment of…
2Cases cited61 opinions
- Carol A. Gallo v. Prudential Residential Services, Limited Partnership, Doing Business as Prudential Relocation ManagementCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1994
- Simonds v. SimondsNew York Court of Appeals · 1978
- W.L. Gore & Associates, Inc., Appellant/cross-Appellee v. Garlock, Inc., Appellee/cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1983
- Snepp v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Eagleston v. GuidoCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1994
56 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Lia v. SaporitoDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2012
- Bliss Clearing Niagara, Inc. v. Midwest Brake Bond Co.District Court, W.D. Michigan · 2004
- Exxon Research & Engineering Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2000
- American Stock Exchange, LLC v. Mopex, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2002
- Bausch & Lomb, Inc. v. Alcon Laboratories, Inc.District Court, W.D. New York · 1999
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.