Legal Opinion
Loctite Corporation, Appellant/cross-Appellee v. Ultraseal Ltd., Appellees/cross-Appellants
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Decided December 17, 1985No. Appeal 84-1687, 84-1737PublishedCited by 338 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BALDWIN, Circuit Judge.
Loctite Corporation (Loctite) appeals from a judgment of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Wisconsin, 225 USPQ 67 (1984), which denied Loctite’s claims that U.S. Patent No. 3,435,-012 (’012), issued to Nordlander in 1969, and U.S. Patent No. 4,165,400 (’400), issued to DeMarco in 1979, were infringed, and which declared the ’400 patent invalid. Loctite, the assignee of both patents, appeals the invalidity and noninfringement holdings with respect to claim 1 of the ’400 patent and the noninfringement holding with respect to claims 1, 3-5, and…
2Cases cited60 opinions
- Anderson v. City of Bessemer CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Santosky v. KramerSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Graham v. John Deere Co. of Kansas CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Woodby v. Immigration & Naturalization ServiceSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Walker Process Equipment, Inc. v. Food MacHinery & Chemical Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1965
55 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by338 opinions
- Renishaw Plc v. Marposs Societa' Per Azioni and Marposs CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1998
- Texas Digital Systems, Inc. v. Telegenix, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2002
- Pennwalt Corporation, Appellant/cross-Appellee v. Durand-Wayland, Inc., Appellee/cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1987
- Smithkline Diagnostics, Inc. v. Helena Laboratories Corporation, Defendant/cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1989
- Constant v. Advanced Micro-Devices, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1988
333 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.