Legal Opinion
A. Aiudi & Sons v. Town of Plainville
District Court, D. Connecticut
Decided September 1, 1994No. Civ. 3:93-2468(AHN)PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
NEVAS, District Judge.
After review and over objection, the Magistrate Judge’s Recommended Ruling is approved, adopted and ratified. SO ORDERED.
MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S OPINION
SMITH, United States Magistrate Judge.
• Plaintiffs brought the present action against the Town of Plainville in a thirteen-count complaint. Federal jurisdiction is purportedly founded on one count under 42 U.S.C. § 1983; the remaining twelve counts are pendent state law claims sounding, for the most part, in contract. Now pending before the court is, defendant’s motion to dismiss the complaint pursuant to Fed. R.Civ.P.…
2Cases cited34 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- United Mine Workers of America v. GibbsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Wolff v. McDonnellSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Daniels v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Union Pacific Railroad v. Village of South BarringtonDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1997
- Gizzo v. Ben-HabibDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2014
- Sanchez v. City of HartfordDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 1998
- Myers v. Penn Township Board of CommissionersDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1999
- Spickler v. LeeDistrict Court, D. Maine · 2002
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.