Legal Opinion
Spickler v. Lee
District Court, D. Maine
Decided July 1, 2002No. 2:02-cv-00067PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
SINGAL, District Judge.
A land owner, filing pro se, sued three managers of Bangor Hydro Electric Company (“Bangor Hydro”), alleging violations of federal and state law arising from Bangor Hydro’s refusal to erect power lines to his property free of charge. Presently before the Court is Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss pursuant to Rule 12(b)(6) (Docket # 2). For the following reasons, the Court GRANTS the Motion. 1
I. LEGAL STANDARD
To survive a motion to dismiss pursuant to Rule 12(b)(6), Plaintiff need only satisfy the notice requirements of Rule 8(a) of a short, plain statement of the…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Haines v. KernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Swierkiewicz v. Sorema N. A.Supreme Court of the United States · 2002
- Jackson v. Metropolitan Edison Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Rendell-Baker v. KohnSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Brentwood Academy v. Tennessee Secondary School Athletic Assn.Supreme Court of the United States · 2001
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Spickler v. LeeCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2003