Legal Opinion
Union Pacific Railroad v. Village of South Barrington
District Court, N.D. Illinois
Decided January 7, 1997No. 96 C 1698PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
GETTLEMAN, Judge.
Plaintiff, Union Pacific Railroad Company (“Union Pacific”), brings this nine-count amended complaint pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 and state law against the Village of South Barrington (“Village”); Warren Fuller (“Fuller”), in his individual capacity and as President of the Village; Sheila Fortney (“Fortney”), in her individual capacity and as Village Clerk of the Village; and Anthony Ariola (“Ariola”), Thomas Siok (“Siok”), Kenneth Tafel (“Tafel”), Bernadine Rosenthal (“Rosenthal”), Gregory Scurto (“Scurto”), and Patricia Graft (“Graft”) in their…
2Cases cited43 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Parratt v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Forrester v. WhiteSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Emil J. Bartholet v. Reishauer A.G. (Zurich) and Reishauer Corporation (Elgin)Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1992
38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Neptuno Treuhand-Und Verwaltungsgesellschaft Mbh v. ArborAppellate Court of Illinois · 1998
- Jenkins v. Mercantile Mortgage Co.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2002
- Leonard A. Feinberg, Inc. v. Central Asia Capital Corp., Ltd.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1997
- Booker v. Board of Educ., Baldwinsville CentralDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 2002
- Kaiser v. FlemingAppellate Court of Illinois · 2000
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.