Legal Opinion

Southern California Lumber Co. v. Jones

California Supreme Court

Decided June 14, 1901No. L.A. No. 813PublishedCited by 2 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the Court

HAYNES, C.

This appeal is from a judgment against appellants, foreclosing a lien for materials furnished for the construction of a building. C. A. Conant, the contractor, and certain fictitious persons were made defendants, hut no judgment was taken against them.

Mrs. E. S. Jones is the owner of the lot upon which the house was built, and E. W; Jones is her husband, and acted as her agent.

On August 1,1898, appellants entered into a contract with Conant for the erection of the house, by which Conant agreed to furnish the materials and labor and erect it for the sum of $837, and plaintiff agreed…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Kerckhoff-Cuzner Mill & Lumber Co. v. CummingsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
  2. Denison v. BurrellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Bailey Ornamental Iron Co. v. GoldschmidtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1917
  2. Nason v. JohnCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1905

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API