Legal Opinion

Golden Gate Lumber Co. v. Sahrbacher

California Supreme Court

Decided December 15, 1894No. 15625PublishedCited by 15 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco and from an order denying a new trial. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtGaroutte, J.

Plaintiffs recovered judgment as materialmen and subcontractors foreclosing liens upon the building of defendant, and this appeal is taken from the judgment and order denying the motion for a new trial.

The contract price was four thousand dollars, payable in four equal installments as the work progressed. *116The first payment was due when the building was framed, and the second payment when the brown coat of mortar was on. In due time the contractor received his first installment of the contract price, and, when the brown coat of mortar was on, demanded payment of the second installment. The…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Porter v. the Arrow Head Reservoir Co.California Supreme Court · 1893
  2. Fanning v. LevistonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
  3. Whitaker v. HaynesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1875
  4. Packard v. WilsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1887

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. American-Hawaiian Engineering & Construction Co. v. ButlerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1913
  2. Fairchild-Gilmore-Wilton Co. v. Southern Refining Co.California Supreme Court · 1910
  3. Integrated, Inc. v. Alec Fergusson Electrical ContractorCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1967
  4. S & Q Construction Co. v. Palma Ceia Development OrganizationCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960
  5. MURRAY'S IRON WORKS, INC. v. BoyceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API