Legal Opinion

Muller v. Rowell

California Supreme Court

Decided December 7, 1895No. L. A. No. 29PublishedCited by 11 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of the County of San Bernardino. John Campbell, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtVan Fleet, J.

This is an appeal from the judgment upon the judgment-roll, with a bill of exceptions, and the only point made for a reversal is that the lower court did not file findings, which were not waived.

While the record shows that no formal findings were signed and filed by the judge, it does disclose that the parties presented and filed an agreed statement of facts covering all the issues, and it is recited: “ That upon the said statement of facts hereinbefore set forth being filed in the cause, the court ordered judgment in favor of the plaintiff in the said action upon the facts of the case as…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Brewster v. HartleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1869

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Taylor v. GeorgeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1949
  2. Crisman v. LantermanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1906
  3. Stanwood v. CarsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915
  4. Zimmerman v. Continental Life InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1929
  5. Robinson v. El Centro Grain Co.California Court of Appeal · 1933

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API