Legal Opinion

Dunlop v. Kennedy

California Supreme Court

Decided May 14, 1894No. 15112PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco, and from an order denying a new trial. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the Court

The Court.

This action was brought to enforce mechanics’ liens. Plaintiffs recovered judgment, and defendants, Alice Kennedy and John F. Kennedy, now appeal from the judgment, and from an order denying a new trial.

The contract was in writing, and in it Gray and Stover . contracted with Alice Kennedy, who is the wife of defendant John F. Kennedy, and was the reputed owner of the premises described, to construct a three-story dwelling-house, and to furnish materials for the same. The contract price was $6,600. It was provided that partial payments were to be made in amounts equal to seventy-five…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Willamette Steam Mills Lumbering & Manufacturing Co. v. Los Angeles College Co.California Supreme Court · 1892
  2. Greig v. RiordanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Burnett v. GlasCalifornia Supreme Court · 1908
  2. Hoffman-Marks Co. v. SpiresCalifornia Supreme Court · 1908
  3. Pierce v. BirkholmCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
  4. Denison v. BurrellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
  5. Blyth v. TorreCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API