Legal Opinion
Torpharm, Inc. v. Ranbaxy Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Decided July 23, 2003No. 02-1590PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CLEVENGER, Circuit Judge.
TorPharm, Inc., appeals the judgment of the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey, which granted summary judgment to Ranbaxy Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Schein Pharmaceutical, Inc., Danbury Pharmacal, Inc., Ranbaxy Laboratories Limited, Ranbaxy Schein Pharma LLC and Ranbaxy Schein Pharmaceuticals, LLC (collectively, “Ranbaxy”), invalidating TorPharm’s United States Patent No. 5,670,671 (“'671”) as obvious. TorPharm, Inc. v. Ranbaxy Pharms., Inc., No. 99-CV-714 (D.N.J. Aug. 6, 2002). Because TorPharm had relied on the novelty of its “improved Form 1…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Graham v. John Deere Co. of Kansas CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Stratoflex, Inc. v. Aeroquip CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1983
- W.L. Gore & Associates, Inc., Appellant/cross-Appellee v. Garlock, Inc., Appellee/cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1983
- Loctite Corporation, Appellant/cross-Appellee v. Ultraseal Ltd., Appellees/cross-AppellantsCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1985
- Constant v. Advanced Micro-Devices, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1988
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Salazar v. Procter & Gamble CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2005
- Woods v. Deangelo Marine Exhaust, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2012
- Sabasta v. Buckaroos, Inc.District Court, S.D. Iowa · 2010
- Torpharm, Inc. v. Ranbaxy Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2003
- Salazar v. Procter & Gamble CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2005
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.