Legal Opinion
Salazar v. Procter & Gamble Company
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Decided July 8, 2005No. 2004-1013Published
1Opinion of the Court
414 F.3d 1342
Alfred SALAZAR, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
PROCTER & GAMBLE COMPANY, Defendant-Appellee.
No. 04-1013.
United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.
July 8, 2005.
Henry C. Su, Fenwick & West LLP, of Mountain View, California, argued for plaintiff-appellant. With him on the brief were Brenda M. Simon and Kent Kemeny.
Charles J. Faruki, Faruki Ireland & Cox P.L.L., of Dayton, Ohio, argued for defendant-appellee. With him on the brief was Thomas R. Kraemer.
Before RADER, BRYSON, and GAJARSA, Circuit Judges.
Opinion for the court filed by Circuit Judge RADER.
Dissenting opinion filed by Circuit…
Also in this document: Dissent.
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Festo Corp. v. Shoketsu Kinzoku Kogyo Kabushiki Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 2002
- The Standard Oil Company, Appellant/cross-Appellee v. American Cyanamid Company, Appellee/cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1985
- Carroll Touch, Inc. v. Electro Mechanical Systems, Inc., Defendant/cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1993
- Elkay Manufacturing Co. v. Ebco Manufacturing Co.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1999
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.