Legal Opinion
Constant v. Advanced Micro-Devices, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Decided June 9, 1988No. 88-1101PublishedCited by 311 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DAVIS, Circuit Judge.
Appellant Constant has raised a large number of separate and diverse issues on appeal. The appealed decisions and rulings of the United States District Court for the Central District of California are all affirmed.
DISCUSSION
In January 1985, appellant James Constant sued a large group of high technology companies for infringements of his United States Patents Nos. 3,950,635 (the ’635 patent) and 4,438,491 (the ’491 patent). The complaint also contained nine counts involving other theories of recovery and included challenges to the constitutionality of 35 U.S.C. § 282 and…
2Cases cited49 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Buckley v. ValeoSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by311 opinions
- Renishaw Plc v. Marposs Societa' Per Azioni and Marposs CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1998
- Comark Communications, Inc. v. Harris CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1998
- Johnson Worldwide Associates, Inc. v. Zebco Corporation and Brunswick CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1999
- Lawrence B. Lockwood v. American Airlines, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1997
- In Re David C. PaulsenCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1994
306 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.