Legal Opinion

Industrial Commission v. Shaner

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided December 20, 1933No. 24185PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtZimmerman, J.

Both of the lower courts founded their judgments principally upon the holding of this court in the case of Industrial Commission v. Rogers, 122 Ohio St., 134, 171 N. E., 35, 70 A. L. R., 1244, that “a juror, while in service as such, is in the service of the county under an appointment of hire,” and if injured during that time, in connection with his duties as a juror, is entitled to be compensated from the state insurance fund.

We stated in that case that the question was a close one. In permitting recovery in the Rogers case, Section 1465-61, General Code, covering those engaged in public…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Corbin v. American MillsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1858
  2. Industrial Commission v. RogersOhio Supreme Court · 1930
  3. Industrial Commission v. BatemanOhio Supreme Court · 1933
  4. County of Los Angeles v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932
  5. McCoy v. Griffith & MuddCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1922

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Sun Cab Co. v. PowellCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1951
  2. General Acquisition, Inc. v. GenCorp Inc.District Court, S.D. Ohio · 1990
  3. Board of County Commissioners v. EvansSupreme Court of Colorado · 1936
  4. Dortch, Inc. v. GoldsteinBedford Municipal Court · 1964
  5. Fenstermaker v. Industrial CommissionOhio Court of Appeals · 1939

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API