Legal Opinion

Sun Cab Co. v. Powell

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided January 10, 1951No. [No. 52, October Term, 1950.]PublishedCited by 40 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDelaplaine, J.

This is a workmen’s compensation case, in which the controversy is whether Melvin T. Powell, an automobile tire repairman, was an employee of Sun Cab Company, of Baltimore, or of Seiberling Rubber Company,'' of Akron, Ohio, when he sustained an accidental injury .’in the course of his employment. ".

Under an oral contract, Seiberling agreed to furnish the tires for all of the taxicabs operated by Sun Cab, provided that several men would handle the tire service on Sun Cab’s premises. Applicants for employment were to be interviewed by Seiberling’s territorial agent and by Sun Cab’s personnel…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Sgattone v. Mulholland & Gotwals, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1927
  2. Moore v. ClarkeCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1936
  3. Bowen v. HockleyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1934
  4. Williams Construction Co. v. BohlenCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1948
  5. Parker v. Travelers InsuranceSupreme Court of Georgia · 1932

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by40 opinions

  1. Keitz v. National Paving & Contracting Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1957
  2. Whitehead v. Safway Steel Products, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1985
  3. B. P. Oil Corp. v. MabeCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1977
  4. Greer Lines Co. v. RobertsCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1958
  5. Keller v. City of AlbuquerqueNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1973

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API