Legal Opinion

McCoy v. Griffith & Mudd

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided November 10, 1922PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the Court by

Judge Thpmas —

Affirming as to appellee Griffith and reversing as to appellee Mudd.

This ordinary action was filed in the Henderson circuit court by appellant and plaintiff below, Dewey McCoy, against appellees and defendants below, J. T. Griffith and Eodney Mudd, seeking a judgment against them for $20,117.00, upon the ground that'plaintiff while serving defendants as an employe at a saw -mill sustained injuries whereby be lost bis left arm, and wiiich was produced, as alleged, through the negligence of defendants in not furnishing him a reasonably safe place in which to…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. McColligan v. Pennsylvania RailroadSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1906
  2. Williams v. National Cash Register Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1914
  3. Madisonville, Hartford & Eastern Railroad v. OwenCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1912
  4. Baltimore Boot & Shoe Manufacturing Co. v. JamarCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1901
  5. Employers Indemnity Co. v. Kelly Coal Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1912

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Sun Cab Co. v. PowellCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1951
  2. Pilger v. City of Paris Dry Goods Co.California Court of Appeal · 1927
  3. Wright v. Cane Run Petroleum Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1935
  4. Industrial Commission v. ShanerOhio Supreme Court · 1933
  5. Jesse R. Olds v. Pennsalt Chemicals Corp.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1970

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API