Legal Opinion

County of Los Angeles v. Industrial Accident Commission

California Court of Appeal

Decided April 22, 1932No. Docket Nos. 8147, 8148PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

TAPPAAN, J., pro tem.

This matter is presented here on two writs of review wherein the County of Los Angeles and the City of Los Angeles are the respective petitioners, seeking a review of an award made hy respondent Industrial Accident Commission in favor of respondents William K. Calderwood and Emma K. Calderwood, and charging petitioners jointly with the payment of the indemnity awarded.

The facts, in so far as they are material here, are briefly as follows: Perman C. Calderwood, the son of respondents William T. and Emma K. Calderwood, was killed at about the hour of 7 o’clock P. M.,…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Western Metal Supply Co. v. PillsburyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1916
  2. Pigeon's CaseMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1913
  3. Press Publishing Co. v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1922
  4. Western Indemnity Co. v. PillsburyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1916
  5. Hillen v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1926

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Laeng v. Workmen's Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
  2. Sun Cab Co. v. PowellCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1951
  3. Van Horn v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963
  4. Villanazul v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951
  5. Larson v. Independent School District No. 11JIdaho Supreme Court · 1933

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API